At least until we’re dead, education’s purpose to help us survive and thrive, not just get a job
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06e3f/06e3ff32c4c77a205e54f59b11e258b5ee654493" alt="A glass sphere on a log"
Next time someone even suggests that education is merely the means of eventually finding ‘employment’ I’m just going to 301 redirect them to this magnificent rant by my extraordinarily talented colleague, Laura Hilliger.
I will be brief because some of my readers are not here for educational philosophy. For decades many in my network have championed actual education, the long-stretch goal of which is essentially self-actualisation. This is a term popularised by Maslow, but even Aristotle was pontificating about our human states of becoming. Education is, briefly, not only acquiring skills but realising our free will, potential and unique unicorn properties so that we can survive the shitshow that is existence. At least until we’re dead, education’s purpose to help us survive and thrive, not just get a job.
In society, education is both contrasted and conflated with other terms like learning, training or skill development. The field is semantically messy, and at the end of the day many don’t care about actual education. For society writ-large, the purpose of education is not self-actualisation, but rather compliance, conformance and control. I’m not talking about educators, you fluffy, beautiful bandits of resistance leaders, I’m talking about the systems around and through which people have access to education. Learning to learn, being intellectually curious, bravely looking the human condition in the face – these are not economically responsible endeavours. Thus, they have traditionally been reserved for the privileged (and the possessed).
Source: Freshly Brewed Thoughts