The '1, 2, 3' approach to organising your working day
I subscribe to the free version of Stowe Boyd’s Work Futures newsletter. He’s jumped around platforms a bit when I think he’d be better off charging a smaller amount for a larger audience on Patreon.
Boyd’s latest post talks about how he approaches his work, a subject I find endlessly fascinating.
I basically employ three styles of work journaling:Breaking down that '1, 2, 3' technique, he notes that (like me) he's realised there's only a certain amount you can sustainably get done in one day:
- On a daily basis, I plan and track my work with the ‘1, 2, 3′ technique.
- On a weekly basis, I plan and track using the ‘must, should, might’ technique.
- On ‘agenda’ projects, I plan and track using the ‘do, do, do’ technique. I use the term ‘agenda’ to distinguish with the short-range calendar orientation of daily and weekly projects. This will make more sense, later on.
Specifically, I have learned that I can do the following:I'm not sure how many hours per day Boyd works, but I bet it varies. What I like about this approach is that having a 'major activity' that you check off each day makes you feel like you've achieved something. A day full of short and medium-sized activities feels somewhat wasted.
- One major activity, such as working for a few hours on client research, or writing for a few hours. This is the ‘1′ in the ‘1, 2, 3′.
- Two medium sized activities, like a 45 minute phone call, or doing an hour-long webinar. This is the ‘2′ in the ‘1, 2, 3′.
- Three short activities, taking less than 45 minutes. This is the ‘3′ in the ‘1, 2, 3′.
Source: Work Futures